The Coriolis Effect: Why It’s a Myth Used to Support the Globe Lie

Introduction

One of the most frequently cited “proofs” of a spinning Earth is the Coriolis Effect—the supposed deflection of moving objects due to Earth’s rotation. According to mainstream science, this effect explains why hurricanes spin in different directions in the Northern and Southern Hemispheres and why long-range artillery must account for Earth’s motion.

But what if the Coriolis Effect is nothing more than a myth—a fabricated concept designed to prop up the false globe model?

In this article, we will dismantle the Coriolis Effect by examining:

  1. What Is the Coriolis Effect (According to Science)?
  2. Real-World Experiments That Disprove It
  3. Why Hurricanes and Water Drainage Don’t Follow the Coriolis Rules
  4. The Military’s Role in Perpetuating the Myth
  5. Alternative Explanations for Alleged Coriolis Phenomena
  6. Conclusion: Why the Coriolis Effect Is a Deception

1. What Is the Coriolis Effect (According to Science)?

The Coriolis Effect was first proposed by French scientist Gaspard-Gustave de Coriolis in 1835. It claims that because Earth is a rotating sphere, any object moving over long distances will appear to curve due to the planet’s spin.

Key Claims of the Coriolis Effect:

  • Hurricanes & Cyclones:
  • Northern Hemisphere → Counterclockwise rotation.
  • Southern Hemisphere → Clockwise rotation.
  • Long-Range Projectiles:
  • Artillery must adjust for Earth’s spin.
  • Water Drainage:
  • Supposedly spins differently in each hemisphere.

But do these claims hold up under real-world testing?

2. Real-World Experiments That Disprove the Coriolis Effect

A. The Michelson-Gale Experiment (1925) – No Detected Motion

  • Purpose: Measure Earth’s rotation using interferometry.
  • Result: Detected no significant movement (only a tiny fraction of expected spin).
  • Implication: If Earth were spinning at 1,000 mph, this experiment should have confirmed it.
  • Source: Original Paper Summary (Note: Even mainstream science admits the results were inconclusive.)

B. The Bedford Level Experiment (1838 – 1904) – Flat Water

  • Conducted by: Samuel Rowbotham (later repeated by others).
  • Method: Placed markers along a 6-mile stretch of the Old Bedford River.
  • Result: The water remained completely flat, with no detectable curvature or deflection.
  • Implication: No Coriolis deflection was observed.
  • Source: Earth Not a Globe by Samuel Rowbotham

C. Water Drainage Tests – No Consistent Spin Direction

  • Myth: Toilets and sinks drain opposite ways in each hemisphere.
  • Reality:
  • Small-scale water movement is dominated by container shape, water jets, and initial motion, not Earth’s spin.
  • Multiple experiments (even at the Equator) show no consistent pattern.
  • Video Proof: Smarter Every Day’s Equator Drain Test (Even this pro-globe video shows how easily the effect is overridden by minor influences.)

3. Hurricanes & Water Drainage Don’t Follow Coriolis Rules

A. Hurricanes Can Spin the “Wrong” Way

  • Fact: Some cyclones in the Northern Hemisphere have spun clockwise, contrary to Coriolis predictions.
  • Example:
  • Hurricane Beta (2005) – Defied standard rotation.
  • Typhoon Vamei (2001) – Spun the “wrong” way near the Equator.
  • Source: NOAA’s Own Records (Even they admit exceptions exist.)

B. Water Drainage Is Easily Manipulated

  • If Coriolis were real, every sink and toilet would always drain the predicted way.
  • But in reality:
  • A slight finger swirl can override the effect.
  • No reproducible lab test confirms the claim.
  • Video Debunking: Flat Earth Water Drainage Test

4. The Military’s Role in Perpetuating the Myth

A. Long-Range Artillery Adjustments – A Psychological Op?

  • Claim: Snipers and artillery must adjust for Earth’s spin.
  • Reality:
  • Wind, humidity, and barrel imperfections have far greater effects than an imaginary 0.00007°/hr rotation.
  • The military never provides raw data proving Coriolis adjustments are real.
  • Source: US Army Field Manual (FM 6-40) (No clear evidence, just assertions.)

B. NASA & Government’s Need to Uphold the Globe

  • If the Coriolis Effect were debunked, the entire globe model collapses.
  • Thus, governments and schools reinforce it without allowing real scrutiny.

5. Alternative Explanations for Alleged Coriolis Phenomena

If Earth isn’t a spinning ball, what causes hurricane rotation and projectile drift?

A. Electromagnetic Forces (Plasma Dynamics)

B. Localized Wind & Pressure Systems

  • Storms spin based on local pressure differences, not an invisible planetary force.

C. Inertial Drift (Not Coriolis)

  • Slight drifts in projectiles can be explained by air resistance and minor disturbances, not a spinning Earth.

6. Conclusion: The Coriolis Effect Is a Fraud

Key Takeaways:

✅ No reproducible experiment confirms the Coriolis Effect on small scales (water drainage, bullets).
✅ Hurricanes sometimes spin the “wrong” way, disproving the rigid rule.
✅ Military “adjustments” are likely disinformation to uphold the globe myth.
✅ Alternative explanations (electric forces, wind patterns) fit observations better.

What Can You Do?

  • Test it yourself: Conduct water drainage experiments at home.
  • Question textbooks: Why are there so many exceptions to Coriolis “rules”?
  • Spread the truth: Share this article and demand real science, not dogma.

Further Research:

The Coriolis Effect is not real science—it’s propaganda designed to keep humanity believing in a false spinning globe. The truth is out there for those willing to look.

Think for yourself. Question everything.

Comments are closed.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑