The Nikon P1000 and Long-Range Cameras Prove the Earth is Flat: A Mathematical Breakdown

Introduction

For centuries, the heliocentric model has relied on abstract mathematics and unverified assumptions to “prove” Earth’s curvature. However, modern high-powered optics—such as the Nikon P1000, P950, and other superzoom cameras—allow us to empirically test these claims.

When we apply basic trigonometry, angular resolution, and line-of-sight observations, the supposed curvature of Earth disappears. Instead, these cameras reveal:

Distant objects remain fully visible far beyond the globe’s predicted drop-off.
The horizon always rises to eye level, defying curvature calculations.
NASA and mainstream science rely on lens distortion and CGI to fake curvature.

In this article, we will mathematically dismantle the globe model using optical science, real-world observations, and camera evidence.

1. The Nikon P1000’s Zoom Capabilities: Seeing Beyond the “Curve”

A. Camera Specifications & Zoom Power

The Nikon P1000 has a 125x optical zoom (equivalent to 3000mm focal length).
This allows direct observation of objects 30+ miles away with no curvature obstruction.
Example: Ships, islands, and city skylines that should be hundreds of feet below the horizon remain fully visible.

B. The Math of Earth’s Alleged Curvature

According to the globe model, Earth’s curvature drops:

8 inches per mile squared (standard curvature formula:
[
h = 8 \times d^2
]
where:
( h ) = drop in inches
( d ) = distance in miles

At 30 miles, the drop should be:
[
h = 8 \times 30^2 = 7,200 \text{ inches} = 600 feet
]
Yet, the Nikon P1000 routinely captures objects 30+ miles away with no obstruction.

Video Proof:

Nikon P1000 Proves Flat Earth – 50-Mile Observations
Chicago Skyline Seen from 60 Miles Away (Impossible on a globe)

2. The Horizon Always Rises to Eye Level (Mathematical Proof)

A. Perspective vs. Curvature

On a globe, the horizon should drop away as altitude increases.
In reality, the horizon always stays level with the observer’s eye, no matter the altitude.

Experiment:

At 100,000 ft (weather balloon altitude), the horizon should be 3.5° below eye level.
Actual footage shows a flat horizon:
World Record Balloon Flight – No Curvature

B. The Angular Resolution Test

If Earth were curved, distant objects would disappear bottom-up due to angular obstruction.
Instead, they shrink uniformly due to perspective, remaining fully visible until lost to atmospheric conditions.

Mathematical Breakdown:

Angular size of an object at distance ( d ):
[
\theta = \frac{h}{d} \text{ (radians)}
]
On a globe, obstruction should cut off the bottom first.
In reality, no such cutoff occurs.

Video Evidence:

Ship Remains Fully Visible at 30+ Miles

3. NASA’s Fake Curvature: CGI and Lens Distortion

A. Fish-Eye Lens Deception

NASA and space agencies routinely use fisheye lenses to artificially curve the horizon.
Proof:
Raw footage from high-altitude balloons shows a flat horizon.
NASA’s ISS footage always uses curved lenses.
NASA’s Fisheye Lens Fraud Exposed

B. CGI in “Space” Imagery

NASA’s Earth images are composites, not real photos.
Example: The “Blue Marble” image is a digitally stitched composite, not a single photograph.
Source: NASA’s Blue Marble Hoax

4. The Bedford Level Experiment: Historical Proof of Flatness

A. Samuel Rowbotham’s 19th-Century Proof

Conducted along a 6-mile stretch of the Old Bedford River.
Used surveyor’s levels to measure curvature.
Result: No measurable curvature detected.
Source: Earth Not a Globe – Samuel Rowbotham

B. Modern Replications Confirm Flatness

Jeranism’s Laser Test:
10-Mile Laser Test Over Water
No curvature found.

5. Conclusion: The Globe Model is Mathematically Impossible

Key Takeaways:

✅ Nikon P1000 shows objects 30+ miles away with no drop.
✅ Horizon always rises to eye level (no curvature).
✅ NASA uses fisheye lenses and CGI to fake curvature.
✅ Historical and modern experiments confirm flatness.

What Can You Do?

Test it yourself: Use a zoom camera or telescope to observe distant objects.
Demand answers: Why does NASA rely on CGI instead of raw footage?
Spread the truth: Share this article and expose the globe deception.